28 June 2010

How Thrifty Are We Malaysians???

How thrifty are Malaysians??????  The Chinese are generally very thrifty.  They are careful about two things in their lives.  Firstly with regards to their money and secondly they care about their children education.  Among the Chinese the Hokkiens are more thrifty than the Cantonese.  Thats why per capita there are more billionaires and millionaires among the Hokkiens compared to the Cantonese.  Lim Goh Tong, Robert Kuok, Yeoh Tiong Lay, Vincent Tan, Khoo Kay Peng, Lee Kim Yew, Tee Hock Seng etc etc are all Hokkiens.  The notable Cantonese tycoons are Dick Chan and Chan Ah Chye.

Among the Indians they do practices thriftiness.  Its no accident that Ananda Krishnan is a Ceylonese Tamil.  From this Ceylonese Tamil group comes many of the well known professionals in Malaysia.  Lawyers, doctors , engineers and what not.  They also at one time dominated the Civil Services as Officers and Chief Clerks (CCs) before the Malays came in, in large numbers in the 70s and 80s..

Among the Malays, those with Mamak blood are known to be thrifty (my wife is one of them.  During the 1997 Economic Meltdown she saved me and the family from going under through her shrewd investments).  Kelantanese (the Nik Ahmad Kamil clans) , Minangkabaus (Melewar Group, Antah Group at one time) and Kedahans (Tun Daim, Syed Mokhtar AlBuhary to name a few) know the value of money and are careful about their wealth. They are good and shrewd  businessmen and women. Tun Daim (a Mamak) owns Banks in West Africa and Eastern Europe.

Perakians are not a thrifty lot especially with their sayings  "Biar pape asal bergaye" or roughly be well groomed with style even if it makes us  poor. This is not the norm even though the majority practice it. But Raja Azurin of the Perak Royal Family is in the Millionaire group.  She is an exception to the general rule. 


The bottom line is that we all need to be thrifty and avoid extravagant life styles in order to really enjoy our life and not be hit by poverty through our carelessness and wastefulness..  Wallahu A'lam.
 

 

 

 

Thriftiness: Make Money By Saving Money


Let's face it, we're a nation of overspenders.  Advertisements seduce us into buying stuff that isn't really worthwhile, and credit cards enable us to delay the financial consequences of overspending.  On a more personal level, people often buy material goods because they hope to impress others with a status symbol.  In reality, it is your personal qualities that will impress or turn away other people.  The more money you allow to fly out of your wallet, the more time you'll need to spend working to replace that money.







Getting Motivated: Use Less, Spend Less


Make your money work towards helping you do something you really love doing!  Think about it this way:  A dollar saved is two dollars earned.  For most people, about 50% of spendable income is sucked away by various taxes, so saving a buck is twice as useful as earning one.

To reduce overspending, just do these four simple things:





Thriftiness: Make Money By Saving Money
 

Time to complete:  Varies
Money you'll spend:  $0
What you'll get:  Varies

Step-by-step instructions: 

  1. Think about what is really important to you, what you've enjoyed most in your life.  To what extent was spending money necessary for your enjoyment?  Were there less expensive ways of getting enjoyment out of life?

  2. Whenever you buy something, think twice.  Just before you place the order, think about the amount of time and work you need to exchange in order to acquire the purchase.  Was it worth it?

  3. Save your receipts.  At the end of each month, look at your spending.  Did you enjoy your purchases as much as you thought you would?  You'll probably be surprised at how expensive some of your spending patterns are.  What were the most costly expenses, and how can you reduce them?

  4. Think about how you want your situation to improve.  Try to imagine what it is you really, really want.  Do you need to save more money in order to achieve it?  Do you want to...



    • Take more time off work, to enjoy your life more?
    • Buy something you haven't been able to afford, until now?
    • Apply your savings towards accomplishing your greatest dream?
    • Buy an improved education for yourself or your children?
    • Move to a better neighborhood?
    • Get a job doing what you enjoy most?
    • Start your own business enterprise?
    • Save for retirement or a rainy day?
    • Spend it on a person or worthy cause that you love?

  5. For some more ideas on thrifty living, visit the Dollar Stretcher's Voluntary Simplicty articles.

Further Reading:


19 June 2010

World Halal Research Summit 2010 to look at Services

June 18, 2010 21:10 PM
  
World Halal Research Summit 2010 To Also Look At Services


HDC chief executive Datuk Seri Jamil Bidin with World Halal Research Summit programme book. Pic:Azhar Pidek     
 
KUALA LUMPUR, June 18 (Bernama) -- The World Halal Research Summit 2010 next week is expected to attract up to 1,000 participants as researchers unveil innovations and industry players seek the latest technology while venture capitalists look out for possible investment.

Halal Industry Development Corporation (HDC) chief executive Datuk Seri Jamil Bidin said today the event, held from June 23 to 25 in conjunction with Halal Week, would not only focus on technologies for products but would also look into services such as healthcare, logistics and banking.
"Halal must be from end-to-end. It covers many sectors and is a value proposition that can be applied to many things," he told reporters at a briefing on the summit here.

The event is expected to be opened by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak simultaneously with two other events, namely the World Halal Forum organised by Kaseh Dia Sdn Bhd and the Malaysia International Halal Showcase (MIHAS) organised by Malaysia External Trade Development Corporation (Matrade).

The Prime Minister's wife, Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor, is expected to close the summit on June 25.

Among the speakers at the summit are Halal Products Research Institute director Profesor Dr Yaacob Che Man who will give an update on halal product authentication, and Pure Circle managing director Datuk Arshad Sehan who will speak on "Stevia: The Next Generation of Sweeteners".

Others include Pajiens Antonius Franciscus Maria of Netherland who will talk on "Supercritical Fluid Application in Halal Industry" and Cradle Fund Sdn Bhd senior manager for strategy and initiatives, Ellynita Hazlina Lamin, whose focus is on "Sourcing and Securing Funding for Entrepreneurs".

Jamil said the summit would also have its gala night on the June 23 whereby HDC would be giving the Halal Science Award to acknowledge the individual who has contributed significantly to the halal industry.

It would also be giving away a Halal Champion Award to four companies that have shown success in the halal business, namely in the sectors of food, cosmetics and personal care, livestocks and halal ingredients, he said.

He added that these firms which have received support previously are expected to contribute by creating vendor firms in order to have a multiplier effect in the industry.

The summit will also witness two memorandum of understanding (MoU) signing ceremony between HDC and Taylor's College as well as Iran.

Jamil said although the corporation has collaborated with many government universities before, this was the first time it was addressing research and development at the tertiary level with a private college.

On the deal with the Iranian government, he said HDC could assist Iranian firms that are big in pharmaceuticals with the packaging and marketing, especially in exporting to the western countries.

The summit will also see the launch of HDC's collaboration with DiGi Telecommunications Sdn Bhd on their I-Phone project.


-- BERNAMA

The The May 31st Incident: Israeli Government's macho attitude is actually making the country weaker

My comments:  From the way the Economist covered the May 31st Incident it can clearly be seen that even though the newspaper mentioned that  Israel is becoming lonely in the World's eyes but it never once called the killings of the 6 Turkish Peace Activists as the May 31st Incident. Why?  To me the reason is that the Western media does not want to give a label to the Israeli brutality that occurred on May 31.  Without a label the World would easily forgets the tragic Incident.  We must prevent this from happening.

For comparison the destruction of the World Trade Centre on  September 11 was always highlighted by the Western Media(including the Economist) and full coverage is given on each of its anniversary every year after the Incident.

So we, the International Community who loves and a lasting peace in West Asia should always remember this May 31 Incident where 6 innocent Turkish activists were brutally murdered during the attack on the Aids For Gaza Flotilla  by the Israeli Commandos.  Each year we should commemorates and remembers its Anniversary.  

By doing this we will accelerate the pressures on the Israeli right wing government of  Benjamin Netanyahu to opt for a  peaceful solution and to the creation of an independent Palestine State with full Sovereignty with its capital at Jerusalem.  Thank you.


Israel's siege mentality

The government’s macho attitude is actually making Israel weaker


THE lethal mishandling of Israel’s attack on a ship carrying humanitarian supplies that was trying to break the blockade of Gaza was bound to provoke outrage—and rightly so. The circumstances of the raid are murky and may well remain that way despite an inquiry (see article). But the impression received yet again by the watching world is that Israel resorts to violence too readily. More worryingly for Israel, the episode is accelerating a slide towards its own isolation.  

Once admired as a plucky David facing down an array of Arab Goliaths, Israel is now seen as the clumsy bully on the block.

Israel’s desire to stop the flotilla reaching Gaza was understandable, given its determination to maintain the blockade. The Israelis also had a responsibility to conduct the operation safely.The Aids For Gaza campaigners knew that either way they would win. If they had got through, it would have been a triumphant breaching of the blockade. If forcibly stopped, with their cargo of medical equipment and humanitarian aid, they would be portrayed as victims—even if some, as the Israelis contend, brought clubs, knives and poles. As it was, disastrous planning by Israel’s soldiers led to a needless loss of life.

For anyone who cares about Israel, this tragedy should be the starting point for deeper questions—about the blockade, about the Jewish state’s increasing loneliness and the route to peace. A policy of trying to imprison the Palestinians has left their jailer strangely besieged.

Losing friends, strengthening Hamas
 
The blockade of Gaza is cruel and has failed. The Gazans have suffered sorely but have not been starved into submission. Hamas has not been throttled and overthrown, as Israeli governments (and many others) have wished. Gilad Shalit, an Israeli soldier taken hostage, has not been freed. Weapons and missiles can still be smuggled in through tunnels from Egypt. 

Just as bad, from Israel’s point of view, it helps feed antipathy towards Israel, not just in the Arab and Muslim worlds, but in Europe too. Israel once had warm relations with a ring of non-Arab countries in the vicinity, including Iran and Turkey. The deterioration of Israel’s relations with Turkey, whose citizens were among the nine dead, is depriving Israel of a rare Muslim ally and mediator. It is startling how, in its bungled effort to isolate Gaza, democratic Israel has come off worse than Hamas, which used to send suicide-bombers into restaurants. 

Most telling of all are the stirrings of disquiet in America, Israel’s most steadfast ally. Americans are still vastly more sympathetic to the Israelis than to the Palestinians. But a growing number, especially Democrats, including many liberal Jews, are getting queasier about what they see as America’s too robotic support for Israel, especially when its government is as hawkish as Binyamin Netanyahu’s. A gap in sympathy for Israel has widened between Democrats and Republicans. Conservatives still tend to back Israel through hell and the high seas. Barack Obama is more conscious that the Palestinians’ failure to get a state is helping to spread anti-American poison across the Muslim world, making it harder for him to deal with Iran, Iraq and Afghanistan. His generals have strenuously made that point. None other than the head of Israel’s Mossad, its foreign intelligence service, declared this week that America has begun to see Israel more as a burden than an asset.
That has led to the charge by hawkish American Republicans, as well as many Israelis, that Mr Obama is bent on betraying Israel. In fact, he is motivated by a harder-nosed appreciation of the pros and cons of America’s cosiness with Israel, and is thus all the keener to prod the Jewish state towards giving the Palestinians a fair deal. He has condemned the building of Jewish settlements on Palestinian territory more bluntly than his predecessors did, because he rightly thinks they make it harder to negotiate a peace deal. Mr Obama’s greater sternness towards Israel is for the general good—including Israel’s.

Harmony is not just a dream
   
Israel is caught in a vicious circle. The more its hawks think the outside world will always hate it, the more it tends to shoot opponents first and ask questions later, and the more it finds that the world is indeed full of enemies. Though Mr Netanyahu has reluctantly agreed to freeze settlement-building and is negotiating indirectly with Palestinians, he does not give the impression of being willing to give ground in the interests of peace.
Yet the prospect of a deal between Palestinians and Israelis still beckons. The contours of a two-state solution remain crystal-clear: an adjusted border, with Israel keeping some of the biggest settlements while Palestine gets equal swaps of land; Jerusalem shared as a capital, with special provisions for the holy places; and an admission by Palestinians that they cannot return to their old homes in what became Israel in 1948, with some theoretical right of return acknowledged by Israel and a small number of refugees let back without threatening the demographic preponderance of Jewish Israelis.
And what about Hamas, if Israel is to lift the siege of Gaza? How should Israel handle an authoritarian movement that refuses to recognise it and has in the past readily used terror? One answer is to ask the UN to oversee the flow of goods and people going in and out of Gaza. That is hardly a cure-all, but Hamas would become the world’s problem neighbour, not just Israel’s. The Arab world must do more, pressing Hamas to disavow violence, publicly pledge not to resume the firing of rockets at Israeli civilians and revoke its anti-Semitic charter. The West, led by Mr Obama, should call for Hamas to be drawn into negotiations, both with its rival Palestinians on the West Bank as well as with Israel, even if it does not immediately recognise the Jewish state. It is still the party the Palestinians elected in 2006 to represent all of them. None of this will be easy. But the present stalemate is bloodily leading nowhere.

Israel is a regional hub of science, business and culture. Despite its harsh treatment of Palestinians in the land it occupies, it remains a vibrant democracy. But Israeli's loneliness, partly self-inflicted, is making it a worse place, not just for the Palestinians but also for its own people. If only it can replenish its stock of idealism and common sense before it is too late.

13 June 2010

Tennis Icon Andre Agassi on Fathers and Sons

Andre Agassi. Photo: Dan Macmedan/Contour by Getty Images
You can stop right now. You have everything you need: money, a wife, and freedom. It doesn’t get any better
 
WT: The world knows you as a tennis player. A few months ago, you released your autobiography, Open, and indeed it is . . .
Andre Agassi: As a tennis pro I always led a very public life, and much of what was publicised about me was simply wrong, both the good and the bad. I knew my way around the tennis court, but not the world outside. My life consisted of contradictions that I could never explain.
Do you understand Andre Agassi now?
I understand him differently every day and, like anybody else, I have to work for my inner peace every day.
Your father was known as a taskmaster. Why did you not deal more harshly with him in your book?
My father is unbelievably loyal. I wished he had loved me less. He was always big-hearted. He was just looking for the shortest way to the American dream . . .
. . . and that lay in your success.
My father had a plan, and he was so disciplined you wouldn’t believe it. I don’t know how he did it – two jobs, four children, standing on the tennis court with us hour after hour, all this crazy discipline. He had many positive sides.
But the negatives dominated you for two decades.
I asked him once: “Daddy, how did you deal with the things people said about you, about how you handle things, with yourself, with us?” He said: “I don’t give a damn what others say about me. If I had to start over, I would do everything exactly the same. With one exception: I wouldn’t let you play tennis again, but would get you into golf or baseball. Both sports you could have played longer and so made more money.”
Nice.
You have to understand him. Dad grew up as an Armenian Christian in Muslim Iran. He had to fight a daily fight against the world. He had a mother who treated him badly, and even forced him to wear girl’s clothes to school. He learned very young not to trust anybody. Then when he came to the US he didn’t speak a word of English, but he somehow slogged his way through school. This man never had a choice in his life; he wanted his children to have all the chances he didn’t have. The irony was that he himself did not let us have a choice. He was so poor that success meant nothing to him if he couldn’t earn any money with it. So having a chance meant just one thing: money.
You have two kids. How is your father as a grandfather?
He is OK. Anyway, he always speaks his mind.
What does he say?
My son was playing tennis with him once and hit a ball straight to his body. My father looked at him and said: “If you do that once again I’ll step on your rear end so hard you won’t be able to go to the toilet for two weeks.”
And your son came crying into the house?
Not a single tear, he just wanted to know if a person could really survive if he did not go to the toilet for two weeks. Believe me, we all have a good relationship with my father. To me he is as he always was. He is constantly giving me advice. Once it was about tennis, now it is about child-raising, about what, in his opinion, I should do better as a father.
You have won everything in your 20 years as a pro, all the important tournaments, the Olympic gold medal. You became the top-ranked player in the world. And now you claim in your book that you hated playing tennis.
To understand me, you have to be able to imagine the pressure under which I lived even as a little boy. In our house the atmosphere always depended upon whether I trained well or badly, whether I won or lost. Losing meant that things were bad for all the others, because my father did not accept defeat under any circumstances. At the age of four I already learned that there were quarrels between Dad and my older siblings when they lost. When I watched them play games I was constantly afraid of them losing. They did not win often enough, and I was the last hope. I had talent, I won, but I hated everything connected with it.
At 13 you went to Florida, to Nick Bollettieri’s tennis school. Did the separation make things easier?
I didn’t want to go to camp. I was scared out of my skin. It was more like a punishment camp, sheer horror. And the worst of it was: 4800 kilometres separated school and home. The other kids could see their parents on the weekend, I couldn’t. I began to rebel, and suddenly I was rebelling on a global stage.
But a teenager who hates tennis would soon let everything slip.
You have to look at it this way: I am like an artist who refuses to go on performing when it hurts. I did not at that time accept tennis as a lifestyle. But all of a sudden tennis did provide a chance to make life somewhat more bearable. Trips with my brother, money, supper in good restaurants. But basically it wasn’t much different from jumping from the fire into the frying pan. The pain was just a little more bearable.
In Open, you tell us that at some point you decided to play only for yourself. When was that?
In 1997, when I was 27. I was so bad at the time – number 141 in the world; I had to accept a wild card in order to participate in a tournament in Stuttgart, Germany. Brad Gilbert, my coach then, couldn’t put up with my declining status. He asked me and the team to his hotel room and said: “We’re not leaving here until you make a decision. Either you stop, or we start all over again.” I thought, Hold on, you’ve never liked tennis and never less than at this moment. I didn’t like myself, and I didn’t like what I had achieved.
You had achieved so much by this time. You no longer had to work.
Precisely. I said to myself: “You can stop right now. You have everything you need: money, a wife, and finally you have your freedom. It doesn’t get any better.”
Exactly.
But then I asked myself: “How would it be if I were the only one to decide who I want to be as a player?” The key question was: Is there any reason why I should keep on playing? I had no answer at first, but then I founded my school . . .
. . . the Andre Agassi Foundation, which trains and supports children from difficult social environments.
In this school I could observe how a life changed, and indeed changed for the better. From then on I played for my school. I said to myself: “Tennis goes on being hard, tough for the head, but you are playing for something that lasts, that’s more important than your own needs.”
How do you educate your kids?
I am not a teacher, but I try to teach my own and the other children in my school to be sympathetic. We want to show them what it means to love those closest to you. Education, including character-building, means a huge expansion of possibilities.
Are you more lenient than your own father was?
I have clear ideas about how our children have to behave and how they should approach life. I hope they take on responsibility, for themselves, for others.
When do you become strict?
If my son does not listen, if he hurts somebody or does not behave properly, that makes me angry, very angry sometimes. If he then comes to me later, if he has learned his lesson or accepted punishment, we get along again in a normal way. He has to understand why I had to have a word with him. But he must not be afraid of any lasting emotional punishment. I demand a lot, but I also forgive a lot.
Your children are already financially secure for life. How would you teach them that people have to work hard for their goals?
They do not see us as parents provided with everything and living luxuriously. They can see every day how much energy and devotion I put into my school.
Your wife, Steffi, was feared as a tennis player for her perfectionism. You too were always looking for the perfect strokes. Can perfection be an everyday ambition?
A big one, a very big one, which we both have. In me this won’t change, either. When I decide on something, it has to be perfect, it doesn’t matter whether it’s in the kitchen, for the family, or in my business.
Would you say, I am living as a 40-year-old should live?
I feel like a 60-year-old.
Physically?
Even my heart and head feel older than 40. I’ve had some life.

12 June 2010

Chandra Muzaffar: Palestinian should seize this moment

I am now re-posting this very good article by my former Lecturer at USM, Penang.  During my second year in 1975 he taught us a paper on "The issues in Malaysian Politics".

He is married to a USM alumna who is my super senior,  a nice lady from Kedah.  By the way he is polio stricken.  At that time he moved around with a special walking stick.  Now he sits on a wheel chair and being pushed around by his loyal and elegant wife. 

May Allah give His blessings and Protection to this honourable man Professor Dr Chandra Muzaffar and all his family members.  Ameen Yarrabul Aalameen.  

 

 

CHANDRA MUZAFFAR:
Palestinians should seize this moment

2010/06/12
CHANDRA MUZAFFAR
Share |
The May 31 incident when Israeli commandos killed nine activists on board an aid ship has generated a large amount of goodwill and support. The Palestinians should now capitalise on this tragedy to further their cause, says CHANDRA MUZAFFAR. IN the wake of the flotilla tragedy of May 31, are there signs to suggest that the struggle of the Palestinian people and other Arabs for justice and peace has entered a new phase? Are some elements of the shift more obvious than others? How should we encourage the change that may be taking place?
There are five signs that we may want to focus upon.
One, the flotilla has underscored the growing significance of people’s movements and citizens’ groups in the Palestinian struggle. In a sense, people’s movements have always been part of the resistance to Zionism.
It was people’s movements that first stood up to the intensification of organised Zionist colonisation of Palestine, following the Balfour Declaration of 1917. In the last 20 years there has been a proliferation of people’s movements and citizens’ groups in the Palestinian struggle, including groups that are part of the Palestinian diaspora.
People’s movements and citizens’ groups are a source of strength to the Palestinian cause. Since they are less constrained by considerations that inhibit governments from committing themselves totally to the Palestinians — considerations such as their relationship with the United States in an international system dominated by the West — these forces are able to adopt principled positions on behalf of the oppressed and dispossessed.

Though US and Western dominance is declining, there are still many governments in the Arab and Muslim world that are eager to project themselves as allies of Israel’s most devoted patron and protector. In such a situation, it is not surprising that people’s movements and citizens’ groups have been able to campaign with much greater vigour and vitality for Palestinian rights.
Two, the flotilla has also shown that the movement for Palestine is becoming more and more multi-religious, multiethnic and multinational.

There were a number of prominent individuals from outside the Muslim and Arab world in the six ships that were part of the May 31 flotilla and in earlier flotillas — the most notable of whom was the Irish Peace laureate Mairead Maguire. Equally significant, the active and extensive involvement of Turkish nationals has taken the Palestinian struggle beyond Arab boundaries.

The Palestinian movement should be encouraged to become more diverse in every sense of the word. It is when it embraces the whole of humanity that it will have the moral might and power to overcome Israel and Zionism, with their inordinate influence over US elites s in every sphere of life.
Some Muslim groups that tend to see the Palestinian struggle in exclusive religious terms will have to learn to appreciate the importance of an all-encompassing movement that transcends the Muslim ummah.

Three, the flotilla episode has also highlighted the value and virtue of peaceful, non-violent protest. The flotilla was a protest against the inhuman, unjust, illegal, blockade of Gaza imposed by the Israeli regime since 2007. None of the boats was armed. None of the passengers carried weapons.

It was the barbarism of the Israeli commandos who hijacked the lead ship, the Mavi Marmara, in contrast to the humanitarian mission of the flotilla that has created so much moral outrage. When stark violence is employed to crush peaceful protest, human sympathy is transformed into human solidarity with the victim. It is because the Israeli regime under Benjamin Netanyahu knows that non-violent resistance to Israeli power has tremendous psychological impact upon people that he is going all out to convince the world that the Mavi Marmara activists were violent.

As non-violent opposition to the Israeli regime gathers momentum, as rejection of Israel’s arrogance and intransigence becomes a global phenomenon, it will be totally isolated in the international arena. Israel’s isolation brought about through its own haughtiness will eventually compel its protector, the US, to force Israel to change its policies and to recognise the legitimate rights of the Palestinians.

This is why Palestinian freedom fighters themselves should not at this critical juncture undermine their struggle by resorting to acts of senseless, mindless violence. Killing Israeli civilians or indulging in revenge for its own sake will not advance the Palestinian cause. The goodwill and support generated by the flotilla tragedy should be harnessed to the hilt to strengthen the struggle.

Four, as a consequence of the flotilla episode, advocates of Palestine should step up efforts to tell the world their story. An oppressed people who have justice on their side should not hesitate to convey the truth to millions who still do not know how the Palestinians became the dispossessed, how Zionism and colonialism conspired to deprive them of their land, how the UN betrayed its own Charter and the inalienable right of the Palestinians to self-determination in order to create the state of Israel, and how over the last 62 years through wars, expulsions, usurpation of land, and territorial expansion, successive Israeli regimes have sought to cleanse an ancient land of its indigenous population.

Compared with Israel and the Zionist propaganda machine, whose tentacles extend to every nook and cranny of the planet, the Palestinians have been rather ineffective in sharing their pain and anguish with their fellow human beings.

It is not only the Palestinian case that should be put across with intelligence and eloquence; Israeli manipulations and machinations, its distortions and fabrications, its atrocities and injustices should be disseminated as widely as possible.

Five, if the flotilla tragedy has succeeded in bringing almost the whole of the human family together in condemnation of the Israeli action, can it help to unite the two warring Palestinian groups? Is there anything to suggest that the Palestinian Authority that administers the West Bank and Hamas that is in charge of Gaza, will now bury the hatchet?

If PA and Hamas cannot work together, if their feud continues unabated, will all the other changes that we have talked about here mean anything at all? Without unity and cohesion, without a single overriding purpose that transcends group interests, what hope is there for the Palestinian struggle?

Palestinian leaders from the PA and Hamas should realise that if they do not turn to one another in amity, the flotilla tragedy of May 31 might not be a turning point in the Palestinian struggle for justice and peace.

Dr Chandra Muzaffar is president of the International Movement for a Just World (JUST) and professor of global studies at Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang

8 June 2010

I Remember Yusuf Islam

Photo: Yusuf Islam

I remember . . . the restaurant my parents owned on Shaftesbury Avenue in London. My father was always up before dawn, getting in provisions. He was a hardworking man and we all learned from his example. My older brother, sister and I did every job you can imagine – chef, waiter, kitchen porter, washer-up. My father was originally from Cyprus but he had travelled the world before settling in London. My mother was Swedish and was a nanny in the UK. They met on a night out in the capital.

. . . the bright lights of the West End, the coffee bars, cinemas and theatres. Living in the centre of London quickly made me streetwise and opened me to its influences – musical and otherwise. 

. . . that the Merseybeat inspired me and that by the time the Beatles appeared on the scene every-thing seemed possible. In the Sixties, people were full of hope for the future.

. . . my father gave me £8 [now $12] to buy my first guitar. But I found it hard to sing anyone else’s songs – there were so many chords! So from day one I started to write my own and they were different from what was out there at the time, more angular and lyrical. Songwriting is a craft and I have a knack of being able to tell stories this way, stories with a little twist to them.

. . . my first recording session in 1966. I played to the head of Decca Records and they decided to make “I Love My Dog” and “Matthew and Son”, two of the first releases on their progressive Deram label. It was my lucky break and mainly thanks to the producer Mike Hurst, who was one of the Springfields [with Dusty Springfield and her brother Tom]. He helped me scrape enough money together to fund the session. I was only 18, but he was convinced I had something special.

. . . two years later I was struck down with a life-threatening case of tuberculosis and dragged off to a hospital in the Sussex countryside. I’d been working really hard and over-doing everything. As I lay alone on my back, day after day, looking at the woods outside, something happened within my soul. I knew that there was more to life than what I’d been doing; there was a part about the spirit. By the time I recovered I had a whole new bunch of songs and a new vision.

. . . playing some of my new songs, including “Father and Son”, to Chris Blackwell of Island Records. He was overwhelmed and I signed with him in 1970. Paul Samwell-Smith of the Yardbirds became my producer and put me together with Alun Davies who complements me so well on guitar. We made a good contrast on stage – my dark curls and beard against his straight blond hair. Alun is a steady, earthy type while I’m more moonlit. Our relationship has endured for nearly 40 years.

. . . there was a lot of money around and things got more and more commercial. I made it big in the US but found it hard to balance my spiritual quest with my musical one. Playing live in front of 40,000 people isn’t conducive to much self-reflection.

. . . the wave that saved my life. I was staying with a friend in Malibu in 1976 and the sea looked so alluring I went for a swim. Suddenly I was caught in a riptide and it was impossible to swim back. My faith jumped right up to my heart and I called out, “God! Save me and I’ll work for you!” At that moment a friendly wave came from behind and swept me safely to shore. I felt like I’d been given a second chance.

. . . reading the Qur’an for the first time and how it changed my life forever. My brother gave me a copy for my birthday. I’d studied many other religions and philosophies but this was a revelation. I found it so profound and started to apply the teachings to my own life. The more I changed my conduct, the more amazing life became. It’s hard not to follow the crowd but I started to swim in another direction. I converted to Islam in 1977, changed my name in 1978 and, because in Islam there is only one way to enjoy a partnership (a novel idea to me before then), I married at the Regent’s Park Mosque in 1979.

. . . the peace of mind I felt at becoming a Muslim, a peace of mind I still feel today. I have learned who I am. This had always been a problem for me – I’d changed my name and style a few times before. We are responsible for our own actions and their effect on those around us. Try it for yourself. Go out and swear at somebody and watch his or her reaction. Speak gently and kindly and the response is different.

. . . the day I put down my guitar. It was to be 27 years before I played it again. Instead of music I became involved in education and charity work. I realised I was in a position to contribute to children’s development, to educate them with heart and spirit. I was very proud when my first Muslim school got grant aid. I’ve tried to look at many different ways of reaching out, bridging the gap between perceptions of Islam in the East and the West.

. . . picking up a guitar my son had brought home one day and knowing the time felt right to return to music. I’ve released two albums since 2006, An Other Cup and Roadsinger. Although there is a very conservative Muslim view of the dangers of music – to do with what music might be used for, rather than the art itself – I believe it is something natural and beautiful. I discovered it was the Spanish Muslims who introduced the guitar into Europe some thousand years ago, during a gloriously intellectual period of music and art.

. . . when I was refused entry to America in 2004. [Yusuf’s name was flagged as someone with “ties . . . to potential terrorist-related activities” and he was deported.] I tried to turn what could have been a sinister episode into something light. I thought, “God wants it to happenso let it happen.” I believe it all came down to the confusion in the spelling of my name but the media had a field day with it. I’ve had to develop a tough skin and a sense of humour. In the old days, if someone didn’t like my music, I’d be a little hurt, but when you have to live with a whole load of people thinking the worst of you, you’ve got to stay strong inside.

. . . in my song “On the Road to Find Out” I wrote, “Well, in the end I’ll know but on the way I wonder.” It sums up my journey as Cat Stevens and predicted the Yusuf Islam of today. When you set out with a plan in life and it doesn’t go quite right, it’s because God has a better plan for you. I always try to remember that.

As told to Caroline Hutton

6 June 2010

Billionaire convicts and inmates

Bukan senang hendak berharta dan kaya raya ini.  Matlamat tidak boleh menghalalkan tindakan.  Sesuatu tindakan akan membawa akibatnya.  (Every action will be met with a reaction).

Begitu jugalah jika harta dan pendapatan yang yang kita didapati adalah melalui riba' dan rasuah tidak akan mendatangkan ketenteraman jiwa yang abadi.  Biarlah tidak terlalu kaya sangat asalkan kita tidak bergelumang dalam riba'. Kita bersifat sederhana dalam kekayaan kita. 


Dalam theori material dialektisma mula-mula ada thesis yang dilawan oleh satu antithesis yang kemudiannya menghasilkan satu synthesis baru.

Sebagai contoh di Peranchis pada abad ke lapan belas dalam Revolusi Peranchis,  gulungan feudalisma  King Louis V1 digilotin oleh satu  revolusi yang bersifat satu gerakan sosial dan politik yang radikal.  Kemudiannya revolusi tersebut telah memakan dirinya sendiri.  Pemimpin agung mereka  Robespierre sendiri turut menerima nasib kena gilotin .  Akhirnya timbul pemerintahan pimpinan Napoleon Bonaparte yang bersandarkan ketenteraan yang membawa keamanan dan ketenteraman awam.  Rakyat Peranchis telah muak dan bosan dengan ketidakstabilan revolusi tersebut.  Butir lanjut mengenai Revolusi Peranchis adalah seperti berikut:

The French Revolution (1789–1799) was a period of radical social and political upheaval in French and European history. The absolute monarchy that had ruled France for centuries collapsed in three years. French society underwent an epic transformation as feudal, aristocratic, and religious privileges evaporated under a sustained assault from liberal political groups and the masses on the streets. Old ideas about hierarchy and tradition succumbed to new Enlightenment principles of citizenship and inalienable rights.
The French Revolution began in 1789 with the convocation of the Estates-General in May. The first year of the Revolution witnessed members of the Third Estate proclaiming the Tennis Court Oath in June, the assault on the Bastille in July, the passage of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen in August, and an epic march on Versailles that forced the royal court back to Paris in October. The next few years were dominated by tensions between various liberal assemblies and a conservative monarchy intent on thwarting major reforms. A republic was proclaimed in September 1792 and King Louis XVI was executed the next year. External threats also played a dominant role in the development of the Revolution. The French Revolutionary Wars started in 1792 and ultimately featured spectacular French victories that facilitated the conquest of the Italian peninsula, the Low Countries, and most territories west of the Rhine—achievements that had defied previous French governments for centuries. Internally, popular sentiments radicalized the Revolution significantly, culminating in the brutal Reign of Terror from 1793 until 1794. After the fall of Robespierre and the Jacobins, the Directory assumed control of the French state in 1795 and held power until 1799, when it was replaced by the Consulate under Napoleon Bonaparte.
The modern era has unfolded in the shadow of the French Revolution. The growth of republics and liberal democracies, the spread of secularism, the development of modern ideologies, and the invention of total war all mark their birth during the Revolution. Subsequent events that can be traced to the Revolution include the Napoleonic Wars, two separate restorations of the monarchy, and two additional revolutions as modern France took shape. In the following century, France would be governed at one point or another as a republic, constitutional monarchy, and two different empires.




Billionaire convicts and inmates

By Elena Torrijos – June 4th, 2010
 
Wong Kwong Yu (AP) re-posted courtesy of Forbes
by Keren Blankfeld

28 May 2010, 12:25 PM ET

Wong Kwong Yu, 41 (photo above), was once one of China’s most celebrated and wealthiest entrepreneurs. He was the nation’s richest person in 2006. Now he is behind bars, sentenced last week to 14 years in jail after having been convicted of insider trading and bribery.

Another former Asian billionaire could be in even hotter water. Thailand’s former prime minister, Thaksin Shinawatra, was charged with terrorism this week. The Thai government claims he is responsible for spurring the anti-government Red Shirts during the violent chaos that inflamed the streets of Bangkok over the past two months leaving 88 dead. Thaksin denies involvement.

This isn’t the first time that Thaksin, who made his fortune in telecom, has been in legal trouble. In 2006 he was ousted from the Thai government and in 2008 he was convicted in absentia to two years in prison on corruption charges. He never made it behind bars as he was already out of the country when convicted, reportedly having fled to Dubai. But his family lost the bulk of its money, which was seized by the government. This time, if he were caught, the consequences would be graver. The former billionaire, who has told reporters from his undisclosed location that he did not incite violence, could face the death penalty.

Behind bars

These two tycoons are just the latest examples of a long line of ultra rich outlaws, outcasts and convicts throughout history. There are today at least three former billionaires behind bars in addition to Wong. They include Russia’s Mikhail Khodorkovsky and Platon Lebedev, who have already spent seven years in jail and are now on trial for additional charges. Khodorkovsky and his supporters have strenuously denied allegations against him, claiming he is a political prisoner whose outspoken criticism of prime minister Vladimir Putin cost him his freedom. Also locked up is R. Allen Stanford, the Texan financier accused (though not yet convicted) of running an $8 billion Ponzi scheme. Italy’s Calisto Tanzi, Parmalat’s co-founder was sentenced to 10 years in jail in 2008 for masterminding Europe’s largest bankruptcy; he appealed, but the decision was recently upheld.

Rather than go to prison, other billionaires and former billionaires like Thaksin have opted to adapt to a life in exile or a life on the run from the law.
  
On the run

Joaquim Guzman Loera (“El Chapo”), the world’s most wanted billionaire, has a $5 million reward being offered for any information leading to his capture. El Chapo has been on the run for nine years after reportedly escaping from jail in a laundry cart in 2001. Even while on the run, however, he’s been making a fortune selling drugs through the Sinaloa cartel, one of the biggest suppliers of cocaine to the United States.
The Uzan family in Turkey, worth $1.6 billion in 2001, has its share of members in exile or in hiding. Just this April, Cem Uzan was convicted of various charges, including fraud and bribery. He’s reportedly in exile in France avoiding his sentence of 23 years in prison. His father, Kemal, and brother, Hakan, are also suspects in the case. The outlaw family has been out of billionaire ranks since 2004 when the Turkish government seized more than 200 of its companies in an attempt to collect an alleged $5.9 billion in debt.

At least three other former or current billionaires have spent time in jail including domestic queen Martha Stewart, who spent five months in prison for obstruction of justice, and mall tycoon A. Alfred Taubman, who was behind bars for nine months for allegedly rigging art auctions. Both have returned to their respective empire helms; Taubman, worth $1.5 billion as of our last billionaire list in March, even wrote a book detailing his time behind bars. Stewart is still a multimillionaire but no longer anywhere close to being a billionaire.

Bounced back

Indeed, sometimes convictions are merely temporary setbacks. Three Korean billionaires charged with fraud have all been pardoned and are now running their firms. Chey Tae-Won, chairman of SK Group, South Korea’s third-largest conglomerate by assets, spent seven months in prison after being convicted of accounting fraud in 2003. He subsequently rejoined his company as chairman and was pardoned in 2008. Samsung Electronic’s chairman Lee Kun-Hee was convicted on charges of tax evasion and ordered to pay $130 million in overdue taxes, but he was pardoned in December. He has since returned to his role as chairman of Samsung Electronics, one of the biggest electronics companies in the world.

Currently awaiting an October trial, Galleon Group hedge fund titan Raj Rajaratnam, is hoping to keep his life outside the confines of a cell. Rajaratnam, who is out on bail, is accused of being at the center of a massive insider-trading ring. Although he denies wrongdoing, one of the other accused ring members, Mark Kurland, was sentenced this month to more than two years in jail. But Rajaratnam has reason to be optimistic. This week his lawyer said the Justice Department and SEC are looking into allegations that prosecutors leaked nonpublic information to the media.

Charges of prosecutorial misconduct worked to another accused billionaire’s advantage this year. Henry T. Nicholas, Broadcom’s co-founder, faced two trials this year and a potential 360 years in prison. He’d been charged with 21 counts of options backdating and 4 counts of drug conspiracy. In January, however, a California federal district judge unexpectedly threw out the charges on the basis of prosecutorial misconduct. Nicholas didn’t even have to show up for his day in court.

Gaza Aid Convoy


|
Bookmark and Share
1. The Israelis claim that the activists on the M.V. Mavi Marmara had attacked their commandos with guns, iron rods, scissors and pointed sticks.

2. The last time Free Gaza sent a small boat to take relief supplies to Gaza, Israeli commandos boarded it and towed it to Ashdod.

3. The activists must know that the same thing might happen to them. But it is ridiculous to suggest that the civilian activists planned to fight against the well-armed and well-trained Israelis.

4. Claiming that the activists attacked the commandos first is equally ridiculous. The forces ranged against them were powerful and enormous, capable of sinking their boats. The Israelis have been known to ram supply boats with their armoured naval vessels. What is clear is that the Israeli's were the ones to attack first by dropping their commandos from the helicopter.

5. The Israelis claim that the activists seized the pistols belonging to the commandos. Again this is ridiculous. These are trained soldiers, wearing protective armour and most certainly skilled in unarmed combat. It is most unlikely that raw activists can disarm and seize the guns of the black-suited commandos.

6. In any case, shooting with live bullets against a group of civilians probably armed with wooden sticks is unjustified. The hazy pictures shown by the Israel propagandist of rods being used may not be iron rods at all. They could be wooden sticks as the pictures are dark silhouettes which cannot be identified as activists or soldiers.

7. Our Malaysian reporter who has been released and is in Jordan tells of wooden sticks and water jets from fire-hoseswhich were used by the activists. His story is much more credible. But knowing the Israelis, they will continue to lie about their criminal acts even if they are seen to be committing them by the whole world.

8. Incidentally, the Rachel Corrie is named after a brave 23 year old American girl who stood in front of a bulldozer which was about to destroy a Palestinian house. The Israeli operator of the bulldozer simply ran over her and killed her. This is the standard behaviour of Israelis. The much condemned Chinese faced with the same situation, stopped his tank.

9. It is no surprise that the Israeli commandos would readily kill unarmed civilians. This is the degree of their arrogance. Their sufferings during the holocaust has not made them better humans. They are worse than the Nazis.

Tussle over tycoon's assets

Apa yang boleh kita pelajari dari kes Allahyarham Tan Sri Nasimuddin ini?  Mereka yang ada dua atau lebih isteri penting menyediakan surat wasiat dan pembahagian harta serta merta sementara mereka masih hidup.  Ajal tidak tentu bila Maut akan datang.  Kalau tiada wasiat pewaris akan berebut-berubut.  Apa jadi pada kita yang dalam kubur itu?  Bukankah kita akan tersiksa dalam kubur angkara harta dan kekayaan kita sendiri.

Maka itu ada hadith yang menyatakan bahawa anak, isteri/isteri-isteri dan harta kita akan menjadi fitnah (bebanan) kepada kita bila kita mati.  Kematiaan bila-bila boleh berlaku dan Malaikat Maut bila-bila masa sahaja boleh mendatangi kita.  Sebagai mengelakkan apa-apa masalah selapas kita mati,  eloklah kita cepat-cepat buat wasiat pembahagian harta kita mengikut hukum Farait.  Wallahu A'lam.




The lawsuit claims that Mr Nasimuddin, who died in the US in 2008, had promised to hand over a few companies to Madam Rokiah and her children. -- PHOTO: THE STAR/ASIA NEWS NETWORK


KUALA LUMPUR - THE second wife of Tan Sri Nasimuddin Amin, the founder of Malaysian automobile giant Naza Group, has filed a legal suit to claim RM350 million (S$150 million) and properties in Malaysia and England.
Madam Rokiah Abdullah, 53, and her five children with the late Mr Nasimuddin are also suing for control of six companies now being held by his first wife Zaleha Ismail, 57, and her five children with the tycoon.
The lawsuit also demands that Madam Zaleha declare all assets owned by Mr Nasimuddin in the country and overseas since 2008, the Malaysian Insider news website reported.
It claims that while Mr Nasimuddin was alive, he had promised to hand over a few companies to Madam Rokiah and her children as a way to ensure that they could live independently. But he died in the United States in 2008 before the handover could take place, the report said.
Read the full story in Saturday's edition of the Straits Times.

4 June 2010

Breaking the Mould - An Inspirational Story

Dr Shafique Pirani. Photo: Erich Saide


Some parents believe club foot is a curse. Many believe the deformity cannot be corrected.

 

Atop a hill in Uganda’s capital city, Kampala, in a single-storey building below a corrugated iron roof, part of the Upper Mulago Hospital, 33-year-old Mariam Kemirembe is nursing her five-week-old baby, Shafique Gumisisiriza. Outside, mauve jacaranda-tree blossoms ripple in the breeze and a trussed live turkey, brought to the clinic as a gift, sits patiently in the shade. Inside, under the scrutiny of eight “orthopaedic officer” students, baby Shafique is receiving 20 minutes of treatment that will dramatically change his life. On January 18, 2009, he was born with the most common congenital physical disability in the developing world – club foot, which in almost half of all cases affects both feet. Left untreated, his club foot would remain twisted inward and become increasingly painful, so that when he started to walk, his body weight would be borne on the thin skin on the top of the foot. In a developing country such as Uganda, this lack of mobility would almost guarantee a lifetime of poverty.

Slowly circling the medical team at Mulago is a Ugandan-born Canadian, Dr Shafique Pirani, whose pioneering orthopaedic work may give the infant a better chance in life. Born in 1957, Pirani suffered a life-threatening bout of polio at age three, which left him with a pronounced limp. At seven, he went to England with his mother for some corrective surgery. There, they met an orthopaedic doctor who was himself disabled.

“Your son will make a fine orthopaedic surgeon,” the doctor told Pirani’s mother. From then on, says Pirani, “Mum felt I could be something. Like any mother, she had been worried about what was going to happen to me.”

In 1972, when Pirani was 15, Ugandan dictator Idi Amin forced out the country’s Asians. Initially, the Pirani family went to England, then settled in Canada in 1973. In 1982, Pirani graduated with a medical degree from the Charing Cross Hospital Medical School in London, England, then he moved to Vancouver to train at The University of British Columbia as an orthopaedic surgeon. He went to The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto from 1990 to 1991 to become a paediatric orthopaedic surgeon. It was here that he became fascinated with the problem of club foot, which at the time was thought to be treatable only with major surgery. He subsequently returned to British Columbia, where he began his practice at Royal Columbian Hospital in New Westminster.

In 1996, Pirani read a book by Dr Ignacio Ponseti, a highly respected paediatric surgeon from Iowa. For decades, Ponseti had advocated a method of fixing club foot by applying a series of casts to babies’ feet soon after birth, since the foot of a newborn is predominantly cartilage, then applying a brace, so that surgery was not necessary. Pirani tried it, found that it worked just as well as – if not better than – surgery, and became a passionate advocate of the Ponseti Method, incorporating it into his practice. He hasn’t performed club-foot surgery on a child under two since 2000.

In the land of Pirani’s birth, the health system had become severely compromised. Among the victims were almost 10,000 children with untreated club foot. These kids were a familiar sight, hobbling on turned-in feet or leaning on crutches, watching from the sidelines as their friends played soccer, danced and ran around the schoolyard.

On a family visit to Kampala in 1998, Pirani breakfasted with Canadian paediatric orthopaedic surgeon Dr Norgrove Penny, who said he had been operating on hundreds of Ugandan children with club foot, with no end in sight. Pirani realised that by using the low-cost Ponseti Method he could help alleviate the problem. But with fewer than 12 orthopaedic surgeons in a country of 25 million people, club-foot care would have to involve the training of other health-care workers. Ugandans needed a way to detect and treat club foot that was low-cost and self-sustaining. In Pirani, Ugandans found a native son who, as a colleague says, combined “the abilities of a clinician, surgeon, diplomat and innovator.”

After returning to Canada, Pirani gathered pilot data and applied for a million-dollar Canadian International Development Agency grant, which he was awarded in 2004. Then, in collaboration with The University of British Columbia, the Ugandan Ministry of Health, Makerere University Kampala and the Christian Blind Mission, the Uganda Sustainable Clubfoot Care Project was launched the following year. Since then, hundreds of healthcare professionals have been trained to detect and treat club foot using the Ponseti Method.

 Mariam Kemirembe’s five-week-old son, Shafique Gumisisiriza, gets the casts to correct his club feet. Photo: Isabel Nanton



Here in Kampala on this Monday morning, Pirani meets Sam Kyaligonza, 48, father of five-year-old Solomon Kyomuhendo, who is sitting on his lap. Pirani has asked Kyaligonza and Solomon to come to the clinic for a follow-up, so he can see the results of the Ponseti Method. Solomon’s father shakes his head. “When my son was born, I never expected this,” he says. “There had never been such a deformity in our family. However, my son was treated at Mulago free of charge from two weeks old, and now he is faster than a cheetah.”
Later, Pirani watches as members of the Ugandan orthopaedic team – Diana Mutuhe, 26, and Teddy Mutamba, 26 – expertly work on baby Shafique, gently moulding his foot to correct the deformity.
While Mutuhe holds the infant’s foot in the correct position, Mutamba applies cotton padding to the leg and then, beginning with the toes, applies four or five layers of wet plaster up over the knee, moulding the cast to hold the foot in the proper position. Most club feet are corrected with about five casts; before the final one, it’s generally necessary to cut the Achilles tendon, through a small incision just above the heel, to fully straighten the foot. The procedure is so low tech that when baby Shafique comes for his next cast, in a week, the first one will be loosened in a bucket of warm water. To prevent relapse once the feet are corrected with the casts, Shafique will be fitted with soft leather shoes held apart by a six-millimetre-long metal bar, which are made on-site. These will be worn 23 hours a day for two months, then only at night for the next four years.

Club feet have long been a source of superstition and misunderstanding in Uganda, according to Dean Nathan Wanaswa, contributor to Ponseti Clubfoot Management (known as “The Red Book”), now the manual used for club-foot correction by healthcare workers in the country. In that book, Wanaswa, who is a tutor for orthopaedic officer students in Mulago and a trainer in the Ponseti Method, writes, “Some parents believe club foot is a curse. Many believe the deformity cannot be corrected and are embarrassed to show their child in public.”

Now, radio spots in six local languages tell Uganda’s rural and city caregivers to check for a club-shaped foot at birth, that the condition is treatable and where to get treatment. Ten thousand training manuals, with detailed photos of the treatment method, have been printed.
“It’s not complicated,” says Pirani. “You need an orthopaedic officer trained in the Ponseti Method in every district, as well as plaster and braces.”

Dr Amandua Jacinto, commissioner of clinical services at the Uganda Ministry of Health, says, “This is one of the stories I will tell in my retirement, that club foot intervention as a public health programme has succeeded. Thanks to Pirani, a minimum of 1500 babies have been treated since the programme’s inception and it is expanding to include the whole country.”

Adds Stella Nyange, who runs the clinic office, “Results are real and tangible, bringing hope to mothers who are held responsible for the condition.”

At the Mulago Hospital’s Monday club foot clinic, Namusisi Daisy Masolo talks about Mark Musaazi, her six-year-old son. At birth, Mark’s right foot was clubbed and Masolo worried about how he would cope with a deformed foot. Persuading her husband that it was necessary, she travelled the eight kilometres to the clinic every Monday to have Mark’s foot put in a cast. “And now my mind is settled,” says Masolo. While Mark hops confidently on his right foot, showing Pirani his flexibility, she says quietly, “He doesn’t have a nickname at school and he wears regular shoes.”